This site may earn affiliate commissions from the links on this folio. Terms of use.

CPU-Wafer1

Intel'south Skylake is officially debuting today, just months after the company launched new loftier-end desktop Broadwell chips. It'due south been more than than two years since Intel launched a new desktop architecture, and over a yr since the company's Haswell refresh, the Core i7-4790K, debuted as a high-end enthusiast flake. The new Cadre i7-6700K and Core i5-6600K are meant to replace the sometime CPUs, with new integrated graphics, new chipset support, and an all-new core architecture.

Complete details on that core architecture will have to wait until IDF August 18th, minus what we can glean from early chip tests. Intel isn't sharing much in-depth detail on the chips today. For now, we'll cover some initial results and hash out the platform and its positioning within Intel's lineup.

The road to Skylake

The two new Skylake chips debuting today are the vanguard of a full suite of sixth-generation processors coming after this year. Intel hasn't yet described how it will launch the comprehensive hardware refresh, only given how recently Broadwell debuted in some markets, nosotros would assume that Intel volition push Skylake out on a similar cadence. That mode Broadwell has plenty time in marketplace to move inventory and the visitor doesn't finish upwardly stuck with chips it tin can't sell.

Intel's entire strategy effectually Skylake has been a little strange. When the company announced that Broadwell would launch upwardly to a year late in some marketplace segments, we assumed this would have an impact on Skylake's launch schedule likewise. It only made sense that Intel would hold its cadence timer steady, rather than rushing out a new launch on the heels of the old one. Instead, Intel did exactly that, opting to supplant the older Haswell desktop parts rather than practice a top-to-bottom refresh based on Broadwell.

At the time, this may take fabricated sense, but it introduced an odd hiccup into Intel's roadmap. The company recently announced that its 10nm ramp would be delayed past roughly a year, with a new interim product, Kaby Lake, brought forward to serve in the interim. The only thing Intel has washed with the 10nm ramp is formalize the delay that characterized Broadwell rather than informing investors that it would happen mere months in advance, but the firm could've avoided the need for Kaby Lake if it had simply kept Skylake in the oven for a bit longer.

Either fashion, we're here now — with the first new Intel architecture to debut in over two years. Skylake is the follow-up to Broadwell, which makes it a "tock" in Intel'south nomenclature. The new bit is also congenital on 14nm, but unlike Haswell, it uses a new socket, LGA1151. Forth with a new cadre and socket comes a new motherboard chipset, the Z170.

Z170 Chipset

As initial leaks suggested, the new Z170 chipset makes a number of modest improvements to Intel'southward previous high-cease Z97. GPU PCIe 3.0 connectivity is the aforementioned, merely the total number of USB three.0 ports has increased to 10, up from 6. Full USB 3.0 ports in total is yet 14, though this would seem to address the needs of all but the most crazed USB 3.0 users in general. The major chipset change is the employ of DMI 3.0, upward from 2.0. This ways available point-to-point bandwidth has leapt from 20Gbit/south (PCIe 2.0, essentially) upward to 8GT/s (or 8GB/s). That'southward a huge bandwidth spring for Intel's bespeak-to-point interconnect, and information technology'south how the chipset can feed the 20 lanes of PCIe 3.0 connectivity that the Z170 provides.

Skylake features

There are several new features to discuss regarding the combined chipset + CPU platform. Outset, Intel is offering total base clock overclocking again for the get-go time in years. Previously, overclocking via autobus speed has been extremely limited on Sandy Bridge platforms or in a higher place. While Intel added support for multiples of the FSB, it typically only offered them in set ratios. Now, gamers and enthusiasts will be able to hand-melody processors to a much effectively degree than was previously available.

Skylake Features

The other theoretical advantage is the support of high-cease DDR4, up to and including DDR4-4133. The reason nosotros say "theoretically" in this instance, however, is because the overwhelming majority of consumer workloads are latency express, not bandwidth limited — and DDR4 latency is sufficiently high compared with DDR3 that the gains are going to be small-scale. The highest-end DDR4 on the marketplace, DDR4-3400, is timed at 16-18-eighteen-36. High-quality DDR3-2133, in contrast, is timed at 8-ten-10-27. DDR4-3400 is clocked 1.6x higher than DDR3-2133, but its listed latency figures are also one.6x college. (Actual latency calculations are more complicated than this, so treat these comparisons strictly as a ballpark estimate.)

Relative RAM latency

Relative RAM latency

This is why next-generation RAM standards take and then much time to offer physical overall performance gains compared to previous-gen counterparts. Strictly in terms of latency, the latest modern DRAM standards struggle to motion much past DDR-400 with 2-ii-2-5 latency. That doesn't mean DDR4 is bad, of form, but don't wait to a new retentivity standard to offer much in the way of additional operation.

The Core i7-6700K and Core i5-6600K

Intel is formally announcing two cores today — the Cadre i7-6700K and the Core i5-6600K. Both fries support either DDR4 or DDR3L, with acme speeds up to DDR4-2133 and DDR3L-1600 officially. We've already had our board up to 2667MHz, and then clearly there'southward more than headroom on the hardware than the official standard. Each chip is designed to fit inside the Core i7 vs. Cadre i5 image that we discussed a few weeks ago; the Core i7-6700K has four cores and eight threads for $350, while the Cadre i5-6600K is a four-core, 4-thread chip with a 6MB L3. That said, neither bit is a stand-out leader in terms of raw clock speed — Intel's Core i7-4790K runs at 4GHz with a boost clock of 4.4GHz, while the Core i5-4690K has the same clock speeds equally the Core i5-6600K.

6700K6600K

This is probably why Intel kept its predictions of functioning gains relatively restrained, with a stated "up to x%" improvement for a one-twelvemonth-old PC. Intel is challenge roughly 10% a twelvemonth, meaning that Skylake should be 10% faster than last year'south Devil'southward Canyon, 20% faster than the Core i7-4770K, and 30% faster than the older Cadre i7-3770K, aka Ivy Bridge. I'm still working on finalizing our review (I've been mostly focused on Windows 10), just here's a bit of a sense of taste of what Skylake offers in terms of performance.

I've included two test results below, merely but one of them has a full suite of comparing figures. The x265 test is new, and the only system I had immediately at hand to test against was my own Core i7-3960X. Yet, we see some intriguing functioning figures from just these benchmarks:

x264

I want to talk nigh the older H.264 criterion first, since we've got a healthy set of functioning information to cull from hither. Note that the Core i7-6700K, shown in blueish, is really faster than the six-cadre Core i7-3960X in the first pass and within 2.v% of it in the second. That'southward surprising because we rarely quad-core chips beating past vi-core processors, even when the six-cores are from an earlier generation. The 6700K does have a clock speed advantage over the Cadre i7-3960X, yet, since the latter chip tops out at three.9GHz turbo, compared to iv.2GHz for the 6700K. That 6% clock speed improvement explains some of the Cadre i7-6700K's performance improvement confronting the Cadre i7-4770K, just by no means all of it. Skylake is faster than Haswell by a substantial margin, at least in x264 encoding.

Intel's newer six and eight-core chips nevertheless trounce the Core i7-6700K, but the gap is narrower than one might look.

Finally, in the newer x265 encode exam, we've only got two points of reference — the Core i7-6700K and the Core i7-3960X.

x265

This is a new test that I decided to include out of curiosity, and we haven't checked information technology thoroughly for threading and other capabilities. Even and so, information technology shows a formidable functioning gain for the Core i7-6700K. Skylake wins past Sandy Bridge-E by 30% — a huge gain, particularly for a quad-core processor.

We're working on a total review of Skylake and looking forward to IDF when Intel volition shed more than calorie-free on the architecture of the CPU. Based on what we've seen thus far, however, this is one solid chip.